Darius Liddell and Jon Zaid originally enjoyed 34justice content as members of Ben Spielberg’s political email list.  The three of them decided their joint passions for critical analysis of political and cultural issues could be better served by starting this blog.

Darius Liddell is a free spirit. He frequently follows his thoughts to their logical conclusions – even when they offend his own beliefs and convictions, as they are generally wont to do. He laughs at himself, even when he is crying inside. The most honest skepticism – the kind that cherishes courage, patience, and verve – helps to keep the mind nimble, brisk, and cheerful.  Curiosity is the greater part of intelligence. He believes that the human being is a thousand times more excellent and beautiful than he allows himself to be. He enjoys subtlety, nuts, fruit, and the conversation(s) nobody wants to have but everyone knows is necessary. He begs you to be patient with him, because he dances near abysses far too often. He thinks the most profound question you can ask someone is “Do you actually believe what you are saying, and why?” In brief, he is an artist in love.

Ben Spielberg majored in Mathematical and Computational Sciences at Stanford, but political and ethical discussions are his biggest passion.  His high school elected Dennis Kucinich as the Democratic nominee for President in a landslide in 2004, so he knows progressive candidates can win elections if they message effectively.  Josh Spielberg (his dad), Mike Levy, Jack Schneider, and Glenn Greenwald have had the biggest impact on his worldview, though he sometimes disagrees with all four of them.

Ben currently works as a research associate with Jared Bernstein and manages the Full Employment Project at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, DC (all views expressed on 34justice are his own).  Before joining CBPP in 2014, he spent time as a math instructional coach and middle school math and science teacher in San Jose, CA, where he served on the Executive Board of the San Jose Teachers Association after beginning his career as a Teach For America corps member.

Jon Zaid has many varied interests and would consider himself more well-read if he finished all the books he began. Often the guy at the bar that will initiate a conversation about religion and politics, he fancies himself as someone who knows just enough about a lot. As someone who has worked in numerous medical research laboratories in Philadelphia and Washington, DC he understands the value of sound logic, reflection, and the desire to know the unknown. He believes many (if not all) aspects of human nature are quantifiable, and that humans at the end of the day can use data and reasoning to make the world a better place for all.

Jon is a current third year medical student living in Philadelphia.  Before moving back east, he lived in Berkeley, CA since 2010, where he worked and volunteered at hospitals in some of the most economically depressed areas in the East Bay. He hopes to play a role on the ground level for community advocacy groups for homelessness and education. People often ask him where he lies on the political spectrum and he’ll usually reply snarkily, “I’m just a thinker”. He would be a much more boring person if he didn’t love playing devil’s advocate so much.

6 responses to “About

  1. Adam Jacobs

    Your piece on not voting for the lesser of two evils was good, but I think you should have gone after Hillary supporters much more strongly. You suggest there is legitimacy to the questioning of a third party voter’s intelligence by repeating the line that many dems would consider you an ‘idiot’ for not voting for Hillary. Frankly, they are the idiots-voting for a big money, corrupt traitor and expecting her to fight for liberal values.

    These folks are trapped in a self-defeating partisan shell game-a game our corporate, right- wing media wants them all to play.

    Oh well.
    I won’t vote Hillary either.

    Take care,
    Adam Jacobs

    • Thanks, Adam – glad you liked the piece! I certainly didn’t mean to legitimize the idea that people who reject lesser-of-two-evils voting are “idiots” – my aim was to explain that those comments are both incorrect and counterproductive. I also don’t think those who accept lesser-of-two-evils voting are idiots, however; I just think they weight short-term considerations and the immediate harm they think will occur more than the long-term impacts of their strategy, which they don’t see as definite (as I wrote, I think that decision is misguided, but I understand it; I also respect a lot of people who have that opinion, though I will continue to try to convince them it is misguided). Let’s hope Bernie wins the primary!

  2. Is there some way I can print your wonderful work in http://www.cynicaltimes,org?

    Happy to trade stories,

    Victor Epstein

  3. Hi Ben,
    This is an excellent blog, but if I could suggest an improvement, please give larger versions of your images. I have courted blindness by squinting at the tiny bar graph in the piece about privilege and Jill Stein voters. Thanks.

    • Thanks, Vivian, for both the kind words and the suggestion! I am uploading the graph again with bigger fonts for the percentages – hopefully it is a little easier to see now – and will keep this comment in mind in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s